Wax or hard mud?




WAX  OR HARD MUD? 

Mario D’Couto 


              We just celebrated the feast of the Epiphany a few days ago. As I reflect on this, what strikes me as about this is two contrasting positions (read on to find out). If you have read my blogpost/article, “Christmas – A time to reflect”, this is just to reiterate what was mentioned before.

            When our Blessed Lord was born, Herod, driven by insecurity, sought the Lord not to pay homage and honour but to kill Him. Why? Because he felt threatened that he would lose his position whereas the three wise kings, to who this feast is attributed, sought the Lord to honour Him (Matthew 2: 1 – 12). What is our approach? How is our relationship with God? I remember when I used to teach in Sunday school, I used to tell the children that unless they felt the need for God, as Someone they cannot do without on a daily basis, no matter whatever the practices of piety may be there, it won’t help because that’s what animates and enlivens our relationship. If that is not there, we are probably just going through the motions without realizing why we are doing what we are doing.

     God Almighty invites us to a personal communion with Him. Do we become insecure and feel uncomfortable with the thought that if we come closer to God, we may have to give up certain things, in fact, it so happens that more often than not a lot of atheists do not want to believe in an all powerful God or some may not like to do anything with God because doing so would challenge their lives, demanding them to put effort to live more uprightly, or do we welcome Him with open arms knowing that following His precepts would free us to do more good rather than bind us?

            Here are the words of Bishop Fulton Sheen who, when writing about the Presentation of Our Blessed Lord in his book, “Life of Christ”, had this to say,

“’The Divine Disturber’ would provoke human hearts either to good or evil. Once confronted by Him, they must subscribe to light or darkness. Before everyone else they can be ‘broadminded’, but His Presence reveals their hearts to be either fertile ground or hard rock. He cannot come to hearts without clarifying them and dividing them, once in His Presence, a heart discovers both its own thoughts about goodness and its own thoughts about God.
          This could never be so if He were just a humanitarian teacher. Simeon knew this well and he told our Lord’s Mother that Her Son must suffer because His life would be so much opposed to the complacent maxims by which most people govern their lives. He would act on one soul in one way and on another, in another way, just as the sun shines on wax and softens it and shines on mud and hardens it. There is no difference in the sun, only in the objects on which it shines. As the Light of the World, He would be a joy to the good and the lovers of light but He would be a probing searchlight to those who were evil and preferred to live in darkness. The seed is the same, but the soil is different and each soil will be judged by the way it reacts to the seed. The will of Christ to save is limited by the free reaction of each soul either to accept or reject.”
            Dr. Scott Hahn in his book, “Reasons to believe”, tells of one of his experiences with a student of his who was an agnostic/atheist. It so happened that this student once asked him, “I think that if God did not exist, we’d invent Him anyway. And we did. What do you say to that?” to which Dr. Hahn gave a fitting reply, “You know what I say, John? I say, if God did not exist, we’d invent atheism anyway. And we did. John, I don’t know what you’re like but I know what I’m like. And I know what God is like – at least the God I say I believe in. That God, is infinite and He is all good too and all righteous and perfectly holy. And He commands me to be perfectly holy too. Since He’s all wise, He knows exactly when I’m not holy or good and He judges me based on what He knows. Oh, and He’s immutable, too, so He’ll never change. He’ll always be the way He is now; so He always holds the same standards and He’s always going to judge me by every idle word I utter.”

 
           He (Dr. Hahn) went on to say, “I have to admit, John that, that kind of God threatens my present state of existence and my lifestyle. If I were going to invent a god, I’d probably make one, more congenial to my whims. And if I didn’t have the sense to invent him that way in the first place, I’d at least invent a god who could change his mind.”


            From the above encounter between Dr. Hahn and his student, it gives us an insight into the mind of an atheist and the agnostic which for them, God is nothing but a fairy – tale or a substitute in order to make up for the incompleteness or the void in human life. The pioneer of his trend of thinking goes back to a philosopher name Ludwig Feuerbach, who later went on to influence Fredrich Nietzsche and Karl Marx.

            Fyodor Dostoyevsky, a novelist and a contemporary of Ludwig Feuerbach once made a statement, “If God did not exist then everything is permitted.” This in other words tell us that atheism and agnosticism is not so much an intellectual problem but a problem of the will. Despite the various sources found in order to prove God’s existence, some people just cannot bear the fact that God is real and that is precisely because they want to live on their own terms, not according to God’s will.


            In Romans 1:18, St. Paul recounts how so many people trod along the downward spiral of sin. In his view, immorality and unbelief are co – dependent dispositions. People must ignore or deny God if they want to do things that are objectively wrong. And as these actions become habitual, so does their ignorance or denial of God.




            St. Paul does not treat atheism as an intellectual problem, for God is knowable and people, quite naturally, know the difference between right and wrong. Instead, he treats it as a problem of the heart and will – a failure of nerve. People want their way and atheism is the price they pay for insisting on having their way.




            A person may or may not be a hardcore atheist and the reason I say this is because although one may claim to be a believer and not an atheist, it’s the attitude that also makes a difference. It’s one thing to know God but act like it did not matter while it is another thing to fall down but get back up and strive to make right what one has done wrong.



            To conclude, as St. Thomas Aquinas said, “To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible”, I leave you with this question to reflect, “Are you a ‘wax’ or ‘hard mud’?”

Popular posts from this blog

In the world yet not of the world

The Gift of Life

Are you creative?