Walking through the entrenchment in religious living
WALKING THROUGH THE ENTRENCHMENT IN
RELIGIOUS LIVING
Cl. Mario D’Couto SDB
This is a short reflection which
comes from an article written by Fr. Xavier E. Mananeth CMF. In fact the above
title is taken as it is from Fr. Mananeth’s article. I found this article very
insightful since it proves to be a good source of examination of the way we as
religious live our lives (I am writing this article first, keeping in mind that
I myself am a professed religious and of course this would apply more for those
committed to the priestly and religious way of life. Of course, there are lot
things that even the laity can pick up. But a lot of issues that are mentioned
in the course of this article apply directly in the priestly and religious
context).
It has been observed that in the
life of many religious and priests, there is a great tendency to fall into a
‘box’, a ‘box’ of institutionalism, routinism, ritualism, doctrinalism,
legalism, fanaticism etc. In the name of apostolate, we lose out on our inner
selves. It sometimes happens that some people get so stuck with their
apostolate that they almost come to a crisis wherein they feel that there is no
difference between them and other social workers outside. For all that a
religious or a priest would do is also done by a social worker. Hence what is
the difference?
There is a nice statement which the
author quotes in this article and that is, “Where
religious life is routine, life is dead. Where religious life is bent or being
socially safe and legally proper then life becomes dead. When religious life is
more an ember than a fire, life becomes dead.” Keeping this as the
background, he shares a very meaningful story. The name of the story is “Night Watch”. This story is based on
the life of the famous painter, Rambrandt. It once happened that Rambrandt had
painted a picture called “The Night Watch.”
It was quite popular since it was noted for its contrast between light and
darkness. After the death of Rambrandt, his admirers, in an attempt to keep the
painting fresh added a layer of varnish over the original painting and every
succeeding generation also did the same. Finally the painting became very
different from the original. Surprisingly, however, when the original was
discovered, many expressed shock at the original saying, “This is not Rambrandt.” They know only the painting with layers of
varnish over it so much so that the original when discovered, was strange to
some and scandalous to others.
A similar thing is seen in religious
life. Some religious end up clinging unto the security, power and comfort of
their institutions and their corporate presence rather than offering a personal
Christ-like presence to the people and especially to those who are on the
frontiers and margins of the society, although,
these were people that Jesus served; the unknown, the unwanted, the
anonymous. This is to say that religious life has come to be understood as a ‘profession’ and not as a ‘CALL’ to serve
God and others or to give Christ to others through the work that they do.
What then do we do? RE-VISION!
Today, the time has come for a re-visioning of consecrated life with all its
values, structures and traditions. There is the need for a ‘re-thinking and re-grounding’ of all that we profess and live.
Some of our structures and traditions may be too ill for a meaningful and
relevant existence today. We are unable to let them go because of fear,
fidelity or blind conformity to certain forms or due to ignorance of other ways
that we could be and act. Many of our renewal attempts are about re-arranging
the dock chairs on the Titanic. Re-visioning would call for dying of customs,
of ways of thinking, of modes of behaviour, of world views, system and
traditions in genuine freedom. Reverence for the past traditions alone may not
be enough anymore. These traditions too, as Barbara Fiand says, “had their interdisciplinary roots and must
be understood and criticized within their historical situation. Past behaviours
and values may not be ipso facto holy.”
What then do we conclude? We must
understand that authentic values can be lived in a variety of forms and styles
more in tune with the needs of the Church and the world. For a re-visioning,
what is most important is the willingness to question the ‘why’ of things
without fear of rejection or worry about giving scandal. Such, a questioning
does not imply a negative attitude or the desire to do away with what has been
valued for so long. But it provides an opportunity for an honest
self-examination of our motives in an attempt to arrive at a more authentic
meaning and proclamation of what we have been called forth by the Spirit of God
who will certainly assist us in this open search.